Cloud, Cloud

In Egypt, at the 27th United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP27), a South Pacific leader asks the world to bear witness to the death of his homeland. He is speaking from a screen. In a full suit, flanked by the flags of his country and the UN, he stands behind a lectern on the shore of a nondescript island. His voice carries over the sounds of water on sand, wind through palm trees, and tropic birdsong. He says his islands are sinking. Rising sea levels will swallow Tuvalu whole in a matter of decades. The world has not acted quickly enough since his last speech at COP26. International law determines that a country is legitimized by its physical reality. Tuvalu shrinks. Tuvalu watches king tides erode their statehood.

Addressing the international stage—including the imperial core of industrial and military giants complicit in the climate crisis—Foreign Minister Simon Kofe delivers his people’s final plan for relocation. We have no choice but to become the world’s first digital nation. They will move online. They will somehow upload 3,000 years of history, language, art, culture, stories, people, memories, places, sounds, to the metaverse.

The video is a three minute speech and a slow reveal. It’s a re-creation of Kofe’s recorded message for COP 26 the year before: a lectern and flags set outside, a close-up shot of his bust that pulls back as he speaks. That time, Kofe was revealed to be standing in knee-deep seawater. We are sinking, he said. We cannot wait any longer. A provocative staging, a nation and her ambassador partly submerged. This time, Kofe has remained on the beach and there’s a distinct surreality to his background. You are to believe he’s speaking from the same place as before—the last remnants of Tuvalu’s first casualty in the climate crisis—a small, disappearing island called Te Afualiku. But instead of rising seawater, the camera pulls back to reveal a simulation: Kofe is not in Tuvalu’s islands at all. Instead, he looks out from Te Afualiku’s digital twin. He speaks from a future homeland—an illusion which quickly gives itself away by the tell-tale sheen of video game graphics, palm tree leaves that cast shadows but lack texture. The uncanny flatness of Gaussian blurred skin and sand, an image that falters as it widens toward the pixelated edge. White birds and coral rock wink in and out of existence, a daytime scene is set against a contradictory black sky that is not a sky at all but a data void, loading…loading. It is the first digital rendering of Tuvalu’s family of islands. A reanimated corpse—swallowed by water, rebirthed online. It is the place where Tuvalu has been made to hear its last rites.

The video was a collaboration between the Government of Tuvalu and The Monkeys—part of Accenture Song, and therefore Accenture [ACN), the gargantuan tech company whose employee count is roughly the entire population of Seattle. Its global virality after COP27 belongs to ACN, whose client projects range from national climate advocacy to Bitcoin Super Bowl ads. ACN’s self-proclaimed goal is to help the world’s leading businesses and governments “build their digital core.” They believe in the promise of technology, that the digital future is as real and vital as the deteriorating present. When faced with the question of an island’s drowning, they proposed a sovereignty that goes beyond homeland—untethered, invulnerable. A 200 billion dollar company offers a powerful dream: if reality fails, the immaterial plane will redefine its tenets. In the future, statehood is forever.

Tuvalu’s digital-nation launch would reach some 2.1 billion people globally. I watched it on TikTok that week.

I had just come home from a public hearing: a new resolution to halt U.S. military construction of a live-fire training range. Some 6.7 million rounds of lead ammunition to be fired annually above Guam’s main water source. The resolution was our latest protective attempt in a years-long battle to prevent our islands from becoming mass testing grounds. We’d been here before—our third time in the legislature that year. I hadn’t expected people to show up. They came in a crowd: a young girl in purple overalls holding a painted sign, two old men in dusty polos sporting veteran hats, a row of college students in matching shirts, four senatorial candidates for next year’s election, a pair of moms and their squirmy babies, cultural dancers in traditional regalia. It was a big day. It was a long day. It felt like every big, long day we had organized over the past decade of military buildup activities.

We pled our case for three and a half hours. We itemized our death: 338 acres of bulldozed limestone forest. 260 football fields of our oldest trees and natural filtration systems, gone. Impending lead contamination. 79 ancestral sites impacted. Bones unearthed. Bones boxed and stored in filing cabinets. Re-death. Reburial. We appealed to life: 1.7 million gallons of Guam’s water drawn per day from that single aquifer. We took turns testifying. We held signs. We cited studies. A recurring song and dance performed on the worn edge of old frontlines—our litany for the surviving.

I said my piece and went home in a daze. How much longer of this, do we think. 27 WhatsApp notifications from three different community groupchats. Pictures from the roadside wave where my mouth is somehow open in every single shot. YouTube link to the Guam Legislature recorded livestream of the hearing. Poll for the best day to meet next month to discuss base-building strategies. A clip of the young girl in purple who made the room cry. I tapped to expand the video. I remember her as a child, following her mom to Chamoru language classes with her rainbow assortment of sparkly gel pens. She tells the senators that she’s been coming to these hearings since she was a toddler. She’s graduating high school soon. She doesn’t know if she’ll have children of her own but she hopes she can tell them that she tried. She chokes up when she talks about the land, about a future, better Guam. The room is silent. I still can’t tell if we were all crying for the same reasons. I wish I hadn’t heard her testify. It made me morose. No one tells you how long you’re supposed to keep doing this when you start. The future is a wall.

I muted WhatsApp and scrolled TikTok instead. I saw a video with a Tuvalu flag emoji in the caption and immediately liked it before it could play. I watched as you watch all Pacific news when the world doesn’t pay your region any attention—in solidarity. Then the camera pulled back. And I listened in stunned silence to Kofe’s words playing over a badly rendered VR scene: The world has not acted, so we in the Pacific have had to act . . . we’ll move them to the cloud.

I couldn’t stomach it. The thought of any of our islands reduced to a crude Facebook Sims project with Halo graphics made me ill. I watched it anyway. Because Tuvalu asked. And in the many Pacific sagas of mass dispossession, we are rarely allowed the dignity of last rites. The glitchy birds, the shiny trees, the black sky. Kofe said in his UN speech what we never really get to say in the courtrooms where we beg for help—that mostly, it’s too late. On the international stage and in legislative hearings, the rules are simple: you don’t air grievances without presenting solutions. Any acknowledgment of permanent loss must be accompanied by a meticulous breakdown of advocacy plans, mitigation, and compromise. This is how you’re asked to turn existential mourning into political momentum. In the strategic landscapes of grant-funded projects, the benevolent hands of federal programs, philanthropy orgs, and national museums will throw millions of dollars toward the campaigns of native revitalization—but they do not fund vigils. They have a vested interest in the process of resurrection. No one seems to know what the plan is if none of this shit works out.

The tonal expectation in the goals-outcomes-outputs model of project planning for Indigenous creation has struck as a mass muffling. It resists declarations of catastrophic loss. Gestures at dystopia like Kofe’s undead nation are an ideological liability, a contagious defeatism that kills movements and meaningful base-building. Humanities councils, national coalitions, global initiatives—the great problem solvers of the world offer the dispossessed mile-long applications for assistance that all hinge on the fantasy of our immutable restoration: if you can tell us how you’re dying and how you’ll fix it, then we’ll help you.

The Tuvalu launch of Te Afualiku’s digital twin, then, is a blunt unfixing. As Kofe speaks from a doomed future, he calls into question the deceptive optimism of climate movements that have run out of time. If you won’t accept an invitation to our funerals, then you will deal with our reanimated corpse. If you refuse to hear that it’s too late, we will speak to you from where you have sentenced us: the polity of memory.

a black flower

In Tokyo, at a live show in a dim bar, artists from Okinawa and Guam sing to each other about an old homeland. The crowded room is thick with attentive quiet, lit in tungsten yellow. The wooden walls are a mosaic of linocut posters and rebel iconography haphazardly tacked over every inch of visible space. A painted underwater scene with a mother and child dugong that says NO BASE! An anthropomorphic cat character aims his slingshot at a sky full of helicopters. OSPREY OUT, NO NUKES, SAVE TAKAE. The rolled corner of a silhouetted Che Guevara portrait droops from the ceiling. Some thirty anti-war resisters and serious jazz fans have sardined their way into this upper room that is part izakaya, part pocket-meeting space. Music in English, Japanese, and Chamoru is performed with minimal translation. I’ve come because my sister and her husband are one of the guest bands, Microchild, and we wanted an excuse to visit our friends in Asagaya.

Mostly though, I’ve come for Mizuki—a clever translator and artist who’s been organizing in the Okinawan demilitarization movement for over a decade. She’s friends with the bar owner, the singer from Takae who’s wearing a very cool hat, the pretty belly dancer who performs during the week, the table of old ladies sitting close to the stage, and us—the visitors from Guam. Mizuki knows everyone. She wears a neat bob and smiles with her whole face. She drinks all of us under the table despite being 4’11 and never seems to suffer from hangover. I first met her in Guam, where most people encounter Japanese visitors as tourists—but Mizuki is not a tourist. She’s a resistance leader whose faction consists of highly-organized Japanese grandmas and grandpas who all remember the war. Once a year they visit Guam in little groups to build support across our community movements. Mizuki calls the trips de-tours. When she speaks about Guam she often says I love you and I’m sorry.

Chamorus in Japan can be a confounding spectacle. The entangled history is brutal and sad like everyone else’s in the Pacific theater during WWII. Japan paraded their war crimes across many islands. We were raised by the occupied generation whose landscapes shifted beneath them: villages carpet-bombed, jungles flattened, roads widened. Every day on my way to work, I drive across a river that trails a valley where Chamorus in labor camps were tortured, raped, and beheaded by Japanese imperial soldiers. Then the war ended, some survived, an empire rehabilitated their image, and my grandparents who were there for it all raised kids whose kids love anime. Time passed anyway.

I look across the room and Mizuki beams at me with a watery smile. Soragoro, the Okinawan man, sings Aguas de Marco in his native tongue. A stick, a stone, a sliver of glass. He offers a traditional song from Takae in northern Okinawa, where helipads threaten to destroy his home. He says culture is resistance. He sings and tap-dances and smiles in one sustained lilt. He could be a Yanbaru forest bird. He could be summer rain. Microchild follows his act and performs songs off their Chamoru album, Sengsong Mapagåhes (trans. ‘cloud village’). Eclectic sounds of jazz and soft rock frame vocal laments like the title track and Remember Me—songs that speak of a great vanishing, of a cloud that cannot be seen but whose rain can be heard. A melodica, a sax, a guitar. The trio moves from crooning restraint to lifting crescendos and the room rises and falls with them. I take as many videos as I can. My mom back home is texting me for the play by play. I forget to order something to eat, and matching Mizuki drink for drink makes me warm and dizzy. The show concludes with a spontaneous duet by Soragoro and Microchild performing Blue Moon, parrying the same melody back and forth in Japanese then Chamoru—harmonious in tone, dissonant in language, jazz in execution. The night slips into a pleasant buzz as my foggy knowledge of the original song lyrics in English floats to the surface. Something about a moon that saw us dreaming—alone, then together.

Our walk back to the hotel takes five goodbyes: one in the bar, one at the top of the stairs, one at the bottom of the stairs, one out the window, and one shouted down the street before we turn the corner and out of Mizuki’s sight. The cold has sobered me up enough to follow my sister in a straight line. She gestures widely to her husband, and I think of my grandma. Shannon has a way of benignly pointing at things as we pass them that reminds me of those hands—my grandma walking by a cafe sign and reading it aloud with no intent to expound on whether or not we should further investigate the place or if she’s been there before or if she’s in the mood for a hot beverage. A sort of general, constant acknowledgement of our surroundings. I wonder if our being here makes her ghost a little sad. Tokyo turns my mind into a river. I trail each memory upstream, through the long and tired years.

Sixteen summers before this one: I’m in my grandma’s living room. She’s telling my aunt about a valley. Japanese soldiers. A slow march to a wide clearing. The soldiers are hostile and on-edge. Something is coming. A girl falls in the road and doesn’t get up, an uncle is cut down in the mud. My aunt is asking about a song my grandma struggles to recall. At night they couldn’t be loud. The lyrics remain unclear. They sang in whispers and slept in rows. Crowded bodies murmuring like cicadas. Five summers before this one: I’m marching in Japan with Mizuki. Thousands gather in Hiroshima for the August anniversary. I speak with nuclear survivors here for the World Conference Against A&H Bombs, the soft voice of a translator in my earpiece. An old man describes a river of bodies. Melted skin. Red and red and red. After the public hearings, earlier in the year: my feet are warmed through my shoes as I stand on hot concrete and read a memorial plaque above a glass-covered pit. I’m in Tinian, a sister island north of Guam, at an overgrown airfield. I’m standing where the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs were loaded into the bellies of B-29s and sent off to level a city. The memories blur, my vision swims. The heat of nested summers. I don’t know if I’m remembering it all correctly. I follow my thoughts like receding water until I exit in a cloud.

My sister turns around and tells me she’s hungry. Her husband is navigating us to an udon spot and she’s laughing with too many teeth at a joke I didn’t catch. We’re absolutely sauced. She begins to hum very loudly, a little badly. A group of nice strangers applaud her as they overtake us on the narrow alley path. I try and fail to place the melody.

 

Blue moon, you saw me standing alone.

Blue moon, now I’m no longer alone.

a black flower

In Yona, the road cuts through a valley and I’m still fifteen minutes late to work. I’ve gauged it all wrong again. Woke up early enough to get ready slowly, went slower still. One minute lost scanning the fridge for a nonexistent apple. Three minutes lost listening to the rain. Five minutes lost trying to decide if the rain is bad enough for an umbrella or if a jacket will suffice. Two minutes lost sitting in the car deciding which station will upset me the least. Four minutes lost checking the office group chat to see if work will cancel for inclement weather, even though we never cancel. I’m stuck behind a school bus for predictable reasons. Traffic crawls up the hill near Pago Bay. A pond-sized puddle will soon be a flood warning.

I piecemeal the news through radio static. Operations have begun at the northwest field live-fire training range. It is an uncharacteristically rainy January. Camp Blaz’s completion initiates the multiyear relocation of 5,000 U.S. Marines to Guam. High-surf warning for Boat Basin and Rick’s Reef. Stars and Stripes reports that the plan to move the Marines off Okinawa was born out of massive protests following the 1995 rape of a 12-year-old Okinawan girl by two Marines and a sailor. A developing system 100 miles south of Guam brings heavy showers. Locals demanded the closure of Marine Corps Air Station Futenma due to safety concerns in a densely packed urban area and sought a smaller U.S. military footprint there. 2023 was the second highest year of rainfall ever for Guam since NOAA began recording in 1945. Post-Typhoon Mawar, scientists claim we can expect an increase of extreme weather in the Pacific as climate conditions worsen.

I’m beginning to second-guess the net benefit of morning news. Water drips through the torn seal of my passenger window, sloshes inside the back left door, pools at my feet. Something up the road has halted traffic altogether. I can’t see further than the car in front of me and this too, feels familiar. We idle and I wait for a sign. Nothing moves here but the rain. Where are any of us supposed to go?

 

We in the Pacific have had to act

We’ll move them to

The cloud

//

Sa’ malingu yu’, malingu yu’

(because i have vanished, vanished)

Sengsong Mapagåhes

(cloud village)

Sengsong Mapagåhes

(cloud village)

—Kofe // Microchild

A Haunting in Future Perfect Tense

these threads capture the shadows

and force them to account for the silence

these threads bind your sight to the sob

—Alejandra Pizarnik

these threads capture the shadows

and force them to account for the silence

these threads bind your sight to the sob

—Alejandra Pizarnik

1

Creo que sueñas con una persona cuando la piensas demasiado, Wagner says. Todo el tiempo, todo el tiempo, todo el tiempo.1 It took over a year after Roni’s disappearance in the Sonoran Desert for Wagner to dream of his brother, but once they started, the dreams didn’t stop.

Wagner is Roni’s older brother, and after he left Chiapas for the states, Roni decided to come too. He called Wagner from the tiny border town of Sasabe, Sonora, just before he began the trek across the Sonoran Desert into the US. He knew the guide would take him on a route called El Cerro Elefante, Elephant Peak, after a landmark that won’t be found on any map. Years before, Wagner had made the same journey, so he offered Roni advice. He says Roni was happy. Ponte muy abusado2, Wagner told him. Esto no es un juego3. Wagner never heard from his brother again.

Except in dreams. Inside the purgatorial nature of ambiguous loss, the disappeared are suspended for their family members in a space between life and death. Dreams offer both a mirror of the terrible uncertainty families find themselves in and an escape from it. Dreams are the only space where the missing loved ones can be experienced anew, where they can be present tense. And unlike dreams of the officially dead, dreams of the missing can be interpreted as messages from some corner of the world where the missing loved one is caught and alive.

Ojalá que este sueño me durara, Wagner says. Quisiera tener un sueño largo de dos, tres horas. Ponerme hablar con él y preguntarle todo.4

I listened to Wagner’s story in a podcast produced by the Colibrí Center for Human Rights as part of their Historias y Recuerdos project5, which records oral histories from families whose loved ones have disappeared in the Sonoran Desert. The Colibrí Center facilitates networks for families of the disappeared and works with the Pima County Office of the Medical Examiner to match DNA samples they’ve taken from families with DNA taken from remains recovered in the desert.

For the Colibrí Center, success occurs when a match is made between a family and a set of remains. Colibrí’s work is to solidify death, to bind the missing to an end. The match rescues the dreamer from the dream’s uncertain origin.

 

2

A year after I first moved to Arizona in 2008, I worked for a conservation corps whose range covered the entire state. Our first job took place in the Coronado National Forest on the US-Mexico Border. Near the military town of Sierra Vista, a huge, white Border Patrol blimp hulked above us while we worked. We were tasked with finding mountainous piles of backpacks, shoes, clothing, water bottles, and discarded tuna cans in places where guides would have groups of migrants stop and ditch their belongings. We would locate one of these piles, then stuff everything into neon green, ultra-thick trash bags to be evacuated by helicopters later and taken to a dump somewhere. They told us to shake out any shoes we found in case there were bones stuck inside. They didn’t say much else. It was the first time I began to understand the Arizona borderlands as a vast and indeterminate graveyard.

At the time of this writing, the Pima County Office of the Medical Examiner (PCOME) database contains the DNA of over 1,300 remains found in the desert. For six months after being found, the remains, often skeletonized by harsh desert conditions, are stored in refrigerated containers at PCOME. The holding capacity is always at a tipping point, and they have applied for funding to create a separate storage facility. If remains aren’t identified after 6 months, they are cremated, and each set of cremated remains is placed in a small, brown box. The small, brown boxes sit in a room on top of other small, brown boxes, stacked five feet high against all of the walls. Not all of the remains in boxes are unidentified, but since the repatriation process is very costly, and home countries often do not have or do not provide the funds, families might wait years to scrape together enough money to bring what is left of their loved ones home. And so the boxes of the cremated remains of people who have died crossing the desert, known and unknown, pile up in a room in a building near the air force base in the south of Tucson.

Beyond the city which contains this room, there are massive stretches of land empty and near empty of human life. Because large trees only grow on high elevation mountains, most of the desert is laid bare. It is often the land itself, its rolling and jagged rises and folds, which blocks lines of sight. In places closest to the border there is always the possibility that a dry riverbed or hillside might hold a femur, a jawbone, a desiccated corpse.

In the desert, people can disappear without a trace. Their remains may never be found. A set of recovered remains serves as a trace of a disappearance, but the identity of those remains may never be discovered. A set of recovered remains may never be matched with a family, and families may never find what remains of their missing loved ones.

A haunting permeates the Sonoran Desert, simultaneously in past, present, and future tense. The people who died. The deaths which are occurring. The deaths which will occur. And an even stranger grammar: future perfect. All of the deaths yet to be discovered. The deaths which, if their remains are found or matched with loved ones, will have been.

 

3

As they often do, the inscrutable logics of the border changed direction at the end of 2023. Suddenly there were hundreds of migrants camped out on the US side of the border wall, about 70 miles southwest of Tucson. Everyone was waiting for the chance to ask for asylum, and Border Patrol, which usually chases people down for crossing illegally, took their time coming around. The families, many with toddlers in tow, were left for days in the desert while Border Patrol refused to pick them up. Local aid groups set up a makeshift camp, and I drove down with friends to pass out supplies for a day.

The Trump wall is very high, and the dirt road which runs alongside it extremely steep. There are breaks in the wall where the construction is incomplete, and there are many holes which people have cut in order to cross. Three men in black balaclavas ran back to the Mexican side with an axe when we drove by. They were using the axe to make a new hole in a patch Border Patrol had made over an old hole. We waved to them, and they waved back. As we traveled, the sun shone through the slats of the wall in staccato flashes which made me dizzy.

It has been said that the Anthropocene is some sort of time travel, Bayo Akomolafe writes, in an essay6 on ancestry and apocalypse. It is almost as if we are looking back at ourselves from the devastation of a toxic, posthuman world, trying to understand our age. I closed my eyes while my friend drove, thrust myself into the future, and imagined the Sonoran Desert as an archeological site of the Anthropocene. Instead of confronting the climate crisis, the world’s second largest greenhouse gas emitter turned the ecosystem at its southern border into a militarized graveyard, evidence of which could be found in the belongings of those forced to take the dangerous journey and the bones of those who didn’t make it. The wall still stood, in its patchwork illogic, a strange spine cutting the land, rusted out. Abandoned surveillance towers leaned askew like slowly falling skeletons. Piles of tires, once dragged to clear roads for footprints, rotted in the hot desert sun. A human of the future, I stood among the rubble of my ancestors, shivering at the traces they left behind.

One day, we will all have died, and we will all have lived in what Dionne Brand calls a vicious period7. Tucson, like all border towns, and the towns which bordered them, and the towns which bordered them, will have existed on the edge of a terrible brutality. As residents of the United States, we will have lived in an age, in an empire, which placed very little value on human life, very little value on life at all.

If families of the missing will have been suspended by this brutality in an ambiguous and oneiric present tense, the towns which bordered the brutality will have been suspended outside of a reckoning which should have been taking place as the crisis unfolded. Much of the general public will have had an amnesiac, dissociated, subterranean relationship to the crisis at the southern border. More, we will have lived in a world in which the general consensus of the Global North will have been that it would not receive the citizens of the Global South as they fled the worsening conditions produced by the insatiable economies of the North.

Whether this will have continued as the prevailing consensus remains yet to be seen, but anyone standing close to the border will have been warped by its logic, and we are all standing close to the border.

 

4

On a hot summer evening in Tucson I went to an event in the backyard of a border education organization. The crowd contained young people recently involved in immigration organizing and elders who have been working on these issues for the majority of their lives. We sat in rows of plastic chairs listening to local thinkers and community organizers share their reflections. It was hot, even for June in Tucson. The backs of our knees sweated, and a hole in the ground erupted with black ants.

It was shocking, someone acknowledged, how far the immigration movement had fallen since the early years of the Obama administration. No party stands with immigrants. Still, many of the people who spoke felt that a different paradigm was possible, and that if we could articulate and work for a logic of open borders8 and unbuilt walls9, then we could see it through.

The meeting had opened with a moment of silence. We were given space to think of the people indigenous to the land, to think of the people of Palestine, and of the people who have died trying to cross the desert. We were instructed to close our eyes, and we were called into presence. As sometimes happens inside a collective silence, the space seemed to expand beyond our edges. Time and space folded briefly so that disparate injustice and resistance could touch. We closed our eyes under the same sky whose darkness holds webs of families dreaming of their absent loved ones. We breathed the vapors of these dreams. I thought of Wagner’s voice reaching towards his dreams of Roni. Me da más fuerza, he says, Me da fé sobre todo porque lo veo en el sueño, lo veo bien.10


1. “I think you dream about someone when you think about them too much. All the time, all the time, all the time.”

2. “Pull yourself together”

3. “This is not a game.”

4. “I ask God to give me these dreams. I’d like to have a dream that lasts two, three hours so that I could talk to him. Ask him questions.”

5. Quotations are taken from an audio interview with Wagner recorded in Tucson, AZ in 2018 and produced by Perla Torres as part of the Colibrí Center for Human Rights’ Historias y Recuerdos project.

6. Akomolafe, Bayo. When You Meet the Monster, Anoint its Feet.” Emergence Magazine.

7. Brand, Dionne and Naimon, David. Between the Covers Podcast. Tin House, 2022.

8. Washington, John. The Case for Open Borders. Haymarket Books, 2024.

9. Shah, Silky. Unbuild Walls: Why Immigrant Justice Needs Abolition. Haymarket Books, 2024.

10. “It gives me more strength. It gives me faith above all, because I see him in the dream, and he is well.”

The Coming of Sahara

Climate Change is an angry beast and we are poking it with sticks

—Wallace Broecker

A lot is changing. A whole lot, and just like Nma, my mother, would say, I can feel it in my body. I can also feel these changes. Nonetheless, I think the changes have gone beyond feelings. I see and hear them everywhere and every passing day. At night, usually before dawn, the wind sings in that voice that resembles an ancient masquerade. It is very scary. Some years back, it used to be like a soothing whistle or flute, something susurrant, until the trees around danced in harmonious bliss to the alluring tune of the wind, spraying out their leaves to the ground when the show ended. Now the wind rattles our windows and doors, sweeps in different calibres of polythene bags and other assorted wastes into our compound, and keeps us half awake at night praying that it doesn’t pull off our roof.

I can also see it coming. In 2015, when I went to stay in far away Gusau, a town located in northern Nigeria along the Sahelian savannah region of the country with my aunt and her family, I couldn’t help but notice how different their environment was from where I was residing, how flat their landscape was, which stretched and stretched one’s eyes until all one could see was the Earth running into the light blue and wooly white sky. How devoid of trees those landscapes were—a scenario which I later learnt in school to be caused by aridity plus desert encroachment.

Gusau was usually hot, especially during the day, even during rainy season. Standing under the sun for too long would result in a nefarious headache to end your day. There were days you wouldn’t even dare walk under it. It felt as though you could stretch out your hands, jump up a little and touch the sun. The surest survival kits for such days were chilled water to quench the burning thirst in your throat and enough of the lukewarm water for bathing each time you felt stuffy and itchy. And coupled with all that, there was serious water scarcity. Morning meant piling up buckets and jerry cans in search of water either from open wells or pipe-borne taps. Long was the queue, fierce was the struggle, impure was the water that we could only use to bathe or wash clothes, especially water from the wells.

I fear the aridity is encroaching into our Guinea savannah region. I fear that the rash and hostile weather condition of Gusau has trailed me back to Nasarawa state where I live with my family. Every day, I pray that the heat and scarcity of water is just a slight change in weather—nothing more, nothing less.

a black flower

I began to notice these changes in my community at the beginning of the year when I returned home from a one-year stay in Lafia, another town kilometers away from where I reside with my family. I live in a rural community that is fast becoming urbanized, but without the necessary social amenities. Houses are cramped into each other and we rarely have electricity to cushion the effect of heat on us. Probably because my community is densely populated, with almost everyone racing against time to make ends meet, most people are too bothered by the economic unfriendliness of the country, to focus their attentions on the changes. But I noticed them within two weeks of my arrival.

Everywhere was dry, and the air was whitened with mist and dry cold in the morning and brown with dust in the evening. I knew these were the prominent features of harmattan, but I felt it was unlike the others that had preceded it. At the turn of February, the cold, misty morning left and was replaced by windy morning, stormy evening and hotter afternoons. And I began to long for the rainy season to arrive.

My mother used to say that it is the romance between the sky and the Earth that birth rain: each time the Earth blows the sky a kiss, she becomes too overwhelmed and shed down tears of joy. What happens to the romance during dry season, especially moments when there was no power and the room was very hot? I would ask. She would point out places that were still having rainfalls in the country. She also added that in her childhood days, they experienced longer rainy periods, and rivers hardly carted away valuables like a heartless thief. A lot of questions kept bothering me: does this indicate we would be experiencing shorter but destructive rains in the future? or dryer and intensely hot heat periods?

In answer to my questions, we experienced irregularities in rainfallmonths that were known for intense rainfalls recorded not more than 10 rains, excluding rainshowers when it drizzles for hours non-stop, which was unlike it. To make matters worse, other neighbouring places and towns down the River Niger were having more rainfall than our town. Nma usually would quip, “See, the rain didn’t fall again. There is too much killings in Nigeria for God to send us rain.”

“But it rained in towns and villages closeby,” I would reply. “Besides, we are not the ones engaging in the killings for God to deny us rain.” I know she was aware of the changes in climatic conditions, but since she was raised in a Christian home, her only justification for it was tied down to religion: God’s wrath on man for turning their backs on him, just like Sodom and Gomorrah, just like in the times of Noah. She knows nothing about global warming as the cause of the ever-changing climate. She knows nothing about the imminent effects climate change will have on us, especially countries located below the sub-Saharan Africa. She knows nothing about how millions of Africans were encouraging desert encroachment by cutting down trees for diverse reasons. So I joined her to pray and longed for the rain so that we would have water in our wells and our crops would grow robustly.

a black flower

During my undergraduate year in the University where I was pursuing a degree in Environmental Management, we were taught that trees contribute immensely to rainfall and its distribution across each region, reasons why the rainforest zone of Nigeria, with so many trees, experiences more rainfall than the savanna and arid regions of the country.

My residence posseses few of these natural components of the environment: few intermittent rivers and fewer scanty trees. In fact, the fewer trees that had survived deforestation in the past, especially big trees that took up space, were going down for new-erected buildings. Fruit trees were countable because of how they become prey to stubborn boys when they start fruiting. This has resulted in fewer trees and hotter afternoons with nowhere to cool off, so you are forced to remain in your hot room, enduring the heat if there is no electricity.

To cap it all, the most ugliest experience is water scarcity. Shortage of water has become a threat to society. Wells are drying up, and it felt like our well was the first to empty its waters. We began to source for water in other open wells around. The first two weeks, we fetched in the afternoon or morning, until the interest of other water searchers began to materialize on the open wells. There were days we would go to the wells to find them dry, dirty and almost empty.

We re-strategized and started fetching the water at dawn before everyone else woke up. But that didn’t help, because the water seemed to be dwindling in quantity by the day, with or without competition from others.

One hot afternoon in the middle of April, I came out to find water to cool off because the weather was considerably hot and saw some children moving to and fro like ants with pails of water of different sizes on their heads. I traced them to their source only to realize it was a pure water bottling companyTruine Bakery and Pure Water Companythat was giving out free water to people. I joined the queue immediately.

Children were stopped from playing and asked to join in fetching the water. Every drop was precious. Everything that had the capacity to hold water was to be filled. Every trip counted, and so the more the heads carrying buckets of water, the sooner the house gets filled with it. One woman even remarked that weren’t the children the ones who consumed water the more? I didn’t agree to that, but I said nothing, listening to the conversations and the women asking their children the same questions: Are all the drums in the house filled up? What of the ones outside?

Soon, it got to my turn, and I took the water home, informing everyone about the turn of events. We too soon came out with our buckets and anything that needed to be filled with water.

And that became our own water cycle system—women fetching water in the morning while children roamed around in the evening looking for water. During school vacation, the children were saddled with the duties of sourcing water no matter the distance.

a black flower

At the beginning of 2023, I got a teaching job at a private secondary school close to where I reside. I find it really tasking, nurturing the future leaders of the country, but what I found more tasking was getting up very early for work after spending most parts of the nights fanning myself with an old magazine to assuage the heat and the body itching that follows to the barest minimum. At school, the other teachers and I usually inspect the children and accord severe punishment to the defaulters—those that are improperly dressed. It reduces the level of nonchalance and wayward dressing amongst the students. We do this every morning.

One fateful Monday morning towards the end of February, I was inspecting the children for improper dressing. A junior student was without her neck tie. I asked her, why didn’t you knot your tie? and she began to play with her fingers, whispering. I lowered myself to her face level, bringing my ears to her mouth. “My mother asked me not to because of my heat rashes.”

“Is that so?” I knew most of the students had series of pranks up their sleeves, so I called another studenta femaleto check to see if it was true or not. They both returned, with the other student confirming the heat rashes. The intense heat of March and April was already rearing its ugly head during the cold harmattan season of February.

The changes are becoming more pronounced. The coldness hangs in the air in the morning, reluctant to leave. The scorching sun sizzles and claims dominance of the afternoon, keeping everyone indoors. Most evenings find mothers crooning for the children to leave the prevalent sandstorms when they are not searching for water. It is taking a toll on everyone.

Maybe one of these days, I will bring it up in my classes. They may have noticed the slight difference in the weather, and it would be a lot of help to them knowing measures that could help them in our climate changing world. It is not too late to teach them about tree planting and nurturing more trees. We all are stakeholders of the environment and it is our responsibility to preserve it. The future is ours to take, and unless we get it right now, the narrative will remain the same, even as the climatic condition continues to change.

Harvesting Grief

“Finding meaning in grief does not mean we’re over the loss or okay with the loss; it means we can find a way to honor the love, even in our pain.”

—David Kessler

“Finding meaning in grief does not mean we’re over the loss or okay with the loss; it means we can find a way to honor the love, even in our pain.”

—David Kessler

Streaks of wet dirt mark the floor beneath our circle of chairs—a sure sign of farmers gathering during the Oregon winter. A vegetable grower laments the missing crawdads she once hunted with her father in Lake Washington as a child. A farm intern chokes up about a news story on rainwater no longer safe to drink. An older cattle rancher talks about relationships lost to the politics of climate change. “My nephew doesn’t call anymore,” his voice strains, but he tries to make light. “At least he’s stopped asking for money.”

I sit with these farmers, asking them to share their most personal climate losses. There’s the beloved hydrangea that perished in the heat dome of 2021. The centuries-old Western hemlock, shading generations of family picnics, that finally succumbed to beetle damage. Fireflies in the Midwest are now uncommon, one woman says.

“The most magical part of childhood . . . nearly gone.”

The lake where one rancher brought his kids to fish is now too warm to sustain vertebrates. I talk about leaving our farm, Wolf Gulch. Like waves pounding the shore, the losses are relentless, one after another, lined up beyond the horizon. We sit in collective heartbreak and I wonder if this gathering is helpful, healing. Afterall, my own climate grief feels oppressive at times.

a black flower

My husband Tom and I first learned to farm in India’s high desert in 1997. Our host family irrigated fields of barley and potatoes from ancient ditches fed by glaciers. We fell in love with agriculture and, soon after, settled in Southern Oregon to start a farm. Our vision: to create a profitable business on marginal land—land on the edge—knowing that property with reliable water and fertile soil was becoming scarce. Humans need to get scrappy, we reasoned, and in our heady idealism, we thought we’d lead the way. We also believed that environmental problems could be traced, at least in part, to the hyper-mobility of our culture. It’s easier to wreck your own backyard if moving is an always an option. We vowed to pick a piece of ground and root down for the long haul.

We bought property in the Siskiyou Mountains, rough with steep slopes, weeds and brush. Wolf Gulch, the land’s water source and namesake, was intermittent, running underground for long stretches of the creek bed. Though the property was not considered farmland, we forged ahead. We dug three large ponds to collect winter rains and designed a gravity-fed irrigation system that required no electricity. Our daughter, Grace, was six months old when we moved there. Four years later, I gave birth to our son, Sam, in the bedroom of our house.

We embraced permaculture and applied its principles to our new farm. Permaculture, a holistic, nature-centered approach to stewarding property, aligned with our practical, ecological worldview. We purchased a subsoil plough and ripped furrows in the fields so the soil could hold more water. We learned to plough along the slope’s contour to encourage moisture to fan along the furrows and keep the soil in place.

That first fall, Tom and I found the property’s largest incense cedar. I craned my neck to see its tippy-top. Elegant branches of lacy needles dappled sunlight hitting the ground. We potted up scores of saplings from under its generous canopy and replanted some on a landslide to restabilize the hillside. Others went in hedgerows between the farm fields, a few into the ground torn by the heavy equipment used to build our ponds. Before long, that single incense cedar’s offspring grew all over the property, providing shade, habitat for songbirds, refuge from the wind, and a toehold for the soil.

Each fall, we seeded cover crops to help the soil hold more water. Thick, viny mats of crimson clover, hairy vetch, milky oats, and annual ryegrass blanketed the ground all winter, then, by late spring, decomposed into mounds of rich humous. Within ten years of production, our fields, once a heavy red clay, boasted a foot of black topsoil. Tom began to refer to the soil as his third child.

“Your favorite?” I teased.

We planted trees between fields to shield crops from the drying north wind. Hedgerows of conifers, fruit trees, and nitrogen-fixing shrubs provided food for us and the birds, as well as glorious summer shade. Permaculturalists call this ‘stacking functions’—one design feature that offers multiple, interconnected functions and benefits, creating a sort of ecological poetry. It’s an approach that is efficient, true and, in the end, beautiful.

Before we bought the property, Tom noticed a red fir growing in a gully. Red fir typically grow at higher elevations, above 4,000 feet, so it seemed out of place—a break in the forest’s pattern. I loved imagining how the fir came to live near our valley floor. I told Sam and Grace this story:

 

Perhaps a hundred years ago, a young woodrat lived on neighboring Red Mountain. One summer, a forest fire burned through her home as she was eating the seeds of a red fir cone. She fled the mountain with the cone in her mouth and found refuge on the slopes of the Little Applegate River. Once she saw the abundance of madrone berries, she dropped the fir cone. A seed from that cone grew into our beautiful tree.

 

Then came our first brush with drought. In 2001, the valley received a third of the average winter rainfall. Our ponds dried and cracked, rendering them useless as sieves. We invested in plastic pond-liners, an expensive but foolproof solution to the cracks. We transitioned to irrigating with drip tape, which uses about 30% of overhead irrigation. The pond liners worked, and we were back in business.

In those early years, I spent hours walking the landscape. I longed for intimacy with place. In 2003, Grace and I discovered western columbine growing under the incense cedar. Sam was not talking yet, likely asleep in a backpack or stroller. It was the only native columbine I’d seen growing on the property, so I made a habit of walking there each spring when it was in bloom, usually a week after lupine appeared along the ditch trail.

For the twenty-five years we lived at Wolf Gulch, we grew organic food for thousands of people and trained dozens of new farmers. We raised our children and created vast networks of human, animal, soil, and plant communities. In the winters, I directed community theater and organized neighborhood musical events in our little valley. Some winters brought less than average rainfall, but we’d made our farm resilient. Or so we believed.

Then several winters of low rainfall and months of record-breaking temperatures ensued and the creek dried up completely. Tom kept the crops irrigated by shortening watering intervals and harvesting early. We transitioned from growing vegetables for a Community Supported Agriculture program to growing vegetable and flower seeds, both of which need less irrigation in late summer. We chose the seed varieties labeled drought-tolerant. We adapted. We made do.

The next few winters passed without much rain. April, notoriously damp and cool, teemed with brilliant, sun-drenched days above eighty degrees. While acquaintances marveled at the dreamy weather, a pit lodged in my stomach. One night that month, lying in bed, Tom told me that some of the trees in our forest were stressed. Drought and beetles.

“The incense cedar and red fir are both dead,” he said, voice flat.

I had stopped visiting those trees once the kids grew into teens, preferring instead to hike up on the ditch trails. But they held such fond memories and were fixtures in Sam and Grace’s early childhoods. It was like the news of losing close relatives.

We began to notice scores of Douglas firs dying in the woodlot. I prayed for a wetter May. One blustery Wednesday afternoon, we received a tenth of an inch of rain. June 2021 marched in with the ponds lower than ever and alarming forecasts. An unprecedented heatwave arrived. Medford hit 117°. Atmospheric conditions created huge areas of sweltering heat trapped under a high-pressure “dome”. For twenty-five days straight, the high temperature did not fall below 95.

Tom moved into triage mode, stretching the last of our water to keep plants alive. We took unheard-of measures—using a domestic well to irrigate commercial crops and buying water from town. Trucks rumbled up our half-mile driveway to deliver a few meager inches to the ponds. Farming is notoriously hard. We always knew that. Add drought and relentless heat, and the work becomes demoralizing and untenable.

In July, Tom leaned against the kitchen counter. It was after dark. He looked depleted.

“It’s too hard,” he said. “I think we need to move if we want to keep farming.”

I’d thought the hardest parts of our work were over—raising kids and building a business. We’d invested everything into our family, farm and land. Now what?

I wanted to persevere as we always had. In August, I lay awake wondering how we could store more water. Maybe we could collect rain from our roofs during the winter . . . but the tanks only hold 2,000 gallons each. What if we pumped rainwater from the tanks into our ponds all winter long, every time they fill? I shook Tom awake, eager to talk. He was confused and groggy until I explained my idea.

“It’s a good idea,” he said. “But I already do that.”

Our neighbors rallied around us, offering leases, leads on property, and boundless empathy. Still, I remained terrified. All the work we’d done to protect and steward Wolf Gulch, the lengths we’d gone to store water—none of it could shield us from climate collapse. We were left with the difficult question of where to call home.

Meanwhile, in India, the farmers who mentored us were no better off. They faced the disappearance of glaciers that fed their ditches. Our grief, shared with farmers around the world, means less food security everywhere, and the unraveling of once-vibrant agricultural communities.

The mental health impacts of climate change on the general population are well-documented, but with little attention on rural, agricultural populations1. Also, farmers are less inclined to seek out support and mental health services than the general population2. Yet we are perhaps the most vulnerable to climate anxiety and grief—our attention is fixated on the weather. We spend our days interacting with plants and animals and notice even subtle changes in the environment. We also suffer from excessive heat, more extreme weather events, and wildfire smoke.

Grief most commonly involves the loss of a loved one. In complicated deaths like murder, accidents, and suicide, grievers often experience anger, powerlessness, and regret. Why did this happen? What could I have done to prevent it? Ecological losses are similarly complicated. One moment we rage at politicians and oil companies, the next feel guilt for personal choices, and the next: abject horror in the face of scientists’ predictions. Parents and grandparents agonize over the losses to come.

Tom and I grappled with our future while the heat dome held fast. We had to face it: The forest was dying. The creek would not return. We needed to leave. I learned that British Petroleum knew and intentionally covered up the severity of climate change for thirty years. Rage. Then, guilt: Wolf Gulch was on hospice, and we were abandoning it to face its end alone. Only heartless cowards leave a person on their deathbed. I could barely keep track of my internal landscape—the cascade of emotional states shifted by the hour.

Some griefs are more acknowledged than others. All cultures have rituals for the death of a family member. Of course, this doesn’t make the loss of a loved one easy, but the social support provides a space and tools for the griever. Other losses are not as communally acknowledged, do not have avenues for expression or even a shared vocabulary. This is known as disenfranchised grief. Climate grief is considered a disenfranchised grief because in most cases, social and cultural supports for processing it does not exist. We are in new territory.

My dear friend Zoe, a mental health counselor and staffing manager for a climate foundation, offered to lead a ceremony at Wolf Gulch before we moved. Twenty close friends and neighbors gathered at our house and hiked to the dead incense cedar in silence. We took turns sharing memories about our time on the farm. Zoe led me through a ritual of shattering a ceramic bowl with four hammer blows, each blow a specific loss— the loss of my children’s home, the loss of land that fed us, the loss of trees, and the loss of the creek. I kept the shards, and next year, I will reassemble them using gold glue in the Japanese tradition of Kintsugi. Kintsugi represents non-attachment, acceptance of change, and taking the pieces of our grief and reassembling them with care and beauty.

Climate grief is overwhelming in part because it is ongoing. Losses are cumulative. We have already lost so much, we hardly dare fathom what’s to come. Climate therapists encourage grievers to break through the numbness by articulating one specific loss. Focusing on a single grief—giving space to acknowledge both the gratitude and grief for a place, plant or animal, is a way to catch the tail of the massive climate grief beast. From there, we can begin to feel more, connect with others, and act.

During the ceremony, we honored the red fir and the incense cedar. Those trees helped me find my bearings in a sea of Doug fir and ponderosa pine. They’d sparked my imagination and my children’s. The cedar has become a snag, home to millions of insects and dozens of birds. Grace, now a biologist managing piñon pine forests in northern New Mexico for climate adaption, cored the cedar and told us its life story in rings, precipitation, and heat units. The fir is now a nurse log. In the coming years, plants will sprout along the decomposing bark of its flank. My friends and neighbors thanked us for the chance to acknowledge climate loss in community. I was heartened by the honest expressions, deep sense of solidarity, and ritual.

The month before we moved, my childhood best friend Jess asked me to send her a Ziploc of Wolf Gulch soil. Jess teaches ceramics for a living in a small town in Vermont. A few weeks later, she mailed me back a vase made from the soil. The vase’s outside is rough, simple, and scored, the inside beautifully glazed with swirling green and blue. It sits in the windowsill of our new farmhouse.

a black flower

Back in our circle, the farm intern wipes his face and looks around. His eyes say it all— “This is so much. Too much, maybe.”

A natural human response to unresolved loss is “numbing out” and paralysis. Let’s face it—climate change is terrifying. So the impulse is understandable. But researchers tell us that people who speak openly about their climate distress are more resilient, more likely to act, and benefit from connecting to others. We need to find ways to talk about it. Especially farmers.

I switch gears.

“We’re all resilient,” I say. “Or we wouldn’t be here in this room. We wouldn’t still be farming.”

The flower grower says she lobbies her county politicians. “Local is where we can make a difference.”

The vegetable grower uses breathing techniques to regulate her nervous system. One man plants native trees to feel better.

“I go to the gym,” a beekeeper quips.

An urban farmer engages in guerilla wildflower planting—throwing handfuls of seed into empty lots and waiting to see what emerges in spring.

“It gives me hope for unexpected outcomes,” they say.

Another woman tells us a story—she had been farming with a group of friends in California in 2016 when a catastrophic wildfire scattered them to different places. Whenever she smells smoke and her lungs ache, she texts her friends from the California days. It’s her cue to stay in touch. The rancher admits that he sometimes hugs his cows for solace.

We are in this together, and we’re more resilient when we speak openly about how climate change is affecting us.

In 2020, David Kessler, a colleague and collaborator of Elizabeth Kubler-Ross, added a sixth stage to the lexicon of grief: meaning-making. Kessler argues that finding meaning beyond the stages of grief most of us are familiar with—denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance—can transform grief into a more peaceful and hopeful experience.

Holding climate grief conversations with other farmers has given me a chance to transform my loss into something vital. The response has been overwhelmingly positive—any reluctance to talk quickly melts into connection and empathy. After the gatherings, farmers exchange numbers and ask when we can meet again. By sharing the specificity of our love—for fireflies, crawdads, hydrangea, an ancient incense cedar—and by witnessing each other’s loss and resilience, we find greater meaning in our grief and harvest the energy we’ll need to keep farming.

Tom reminds me that Wolf Gulch was never ours, that we took on the exquisite burden of stewarding it for twenty-five years, but of course it will carry on without us. The land will be here long after we are gone. We leased farm property from friends down the road, moved closer to town, and plan to sell Wolf Gulch next spring. We are still farming.

Now it’s Grace who tells me a story, a new narrative about how the forest is not dying but changing. The red fir and incense cedar may have died, but others will come to replace them in time. Animals, like the woodrat from Red Mountain, and the wind, will carry the seeds and acorns of piñon pine, manzanita and black oak—trees that are better suited to heat and drought. They will take root and build lives at Wolf Gulch. The forest is adapting. There is a new generation leading the way.

 

Sources

1. Howard, M., Ahmed, S., Lachapelle, P., & Schure, M. B. (2020). Farmer and rancher perceptions of climate change and their relationships with mental health. Journal of Rural Mental Health, 44(2), 87—95. https://doi.org/10.1037/rmh0000131.

2. Hagen, B. N. M. et al. “Farmers Aren’t into the Emotions and Things, Right?”: A Qualitative Exploration of Motivations and Barriers for Mental Health Help-Seeking among Canadian Farmers. JOURNAL OF AGROMEDICINE, [s. l.], 2021. DOI 10.1080/1059924X.2021.1893884. 

Dedicated Traffic Police

It is my good fortune to have seen elephants from childhood. Many would imagine I had grown up near a sanctuary, but that wasn’t the case. We lived by an iron-ore mine, and forests surrounded every colony we lived in. The townships we lived in were made by cutting through forests and hills. The roads consisted of ups and downs. Walking with our heavy school bags always felt cumbersome. Life was difficult but enjoyable before internet culture swiped the whole earth inside itself.

The truth is, I lived among elephants since my early days, from when a child begins to pile moments as memory alive, still breathing. We lived in a lowland house. It took about fifteen cement stairs to reach the front garden of our house. In the autumn, when the festivities began, the mahouts came riding, asking for money, rice, potatoes in exchange for the elephants to raise their trunks. And to give rides, especially to the little children. What everyone knew was that the mahouts came from some far state of India. One sweet thing was that each elephant had a name. The mahouts called them by it like humans. Usually they came in numbers of three or four. Every mahout had his own elephant.

I was maybe seven or eight years old. My mother had everything prepared, along with vermilion to smear on the elephant’s trunk, for doing so was considered to bring good luck to the family. Maa asked me to accompany her, though I was very scared of its large, large size. Maybe Maa was trying to remove the fear from me. I went along with her till the lowest stair and stood there unable to go closer. I watched her apply vermilion to its trunk. Then she descended and handed me the bowl containing the jute bag she brought to give the mahout, and returned, forwarding the bag towards the elephant. The elephant understood this and raised the bag to the mahout. After the mahout emptied the bag, the elephant brought it down, placed it in Maa’s hands. The mahout kept exhorting me to have a short ride, saying it won’t harm you. It loves children. I kept nodding my head, no. After the elephant left, I felt relieved, the way a climber feels hugging a tree that still stands stoic after a storm has passed by. One thing that attracted me was the elephant’s small eyes and what I felt were dried tears. This made me ask my mother, does it cry, because its body is tied? Maa must’ve answered something to pacify me. I don’t remember her words. That incident then, now a memory, is as precious to me as light is to a pane of glass.

I was probably ten when, one evening during summer vacation, we heard chaos. We lived in double-lined, single-family detached quarters. The quarters were on either side of the roads, and faced each other. The houses were in a seesaw pattern, ours on the lower end, the road running through the middle. Each quarter had enough space to grow tropical trees and plants. Ours was filled with guava, blackberry and mango trees, many plants like hibiscus of different varieties, and marigolds and common day flowers. In the rainy seasons, the rose balsams filled up whatever space was left vacant.

Between our quarter and another ran a pitch road through which the elephants passed. Following my brother, we both sisters mounted on the iron gate to get a clear view of the road ascending to another colony as they walked through it. In the middle of the elephants’ course was a home that had a huge jackfruit tree with ripening harvest. The elephants broke its tall branches so easily, one wouldn’t believe it if not witnessed. This was very new to us. Our whole colony was stunned by this adventurous happening. No one dared to close in on the elephants until two motorcyclists, being oversmart, passed them at a close distance. Something thrilling always has a risk factor. This angered the female elephant, for the way she turned to face them was quicker than two blinks. Slowly, after eating whatever they could find from the quarter gardens, they moved onwards, on their way to their home: the forest surrounding our place.

As the elephants discovered our colony could provide food to satisfy their hunger, their visits became frequent. They went where they chose with a large number of human eyes on them. Something strange happened: the dogs began barking at the elephants whenever they came. It was believed that this was an instinctual anxious response for the perceived threat from those tall and heavy animals. Another belief was that dogs bark out of excitement. Whatever the reason, the commotion heightened and took time to quieten down.

Often we planned outings to the local bazaar to buy things or to visit the small eateries present here. This place in its smallness contained everything at a walkable distance, one small market and every shop confined at a single place. The news of the elephants’ arrival at any corner of the town spread very fast. We had to cancel our plans for the elephants’ presence here and there.

After several visits with his mate, the male elephant began coming alone. Who was there to tell us what fate had the female elephant met? Or had it gone to some other forest? The male elephant would eat what it found and then leave; this occurred so often that everyone’s interest dwindled, only remaining cautious of its presence for safety.

After the long vacation of almost two months, our school reopened. We saw a house wall broken down on our way to school. The hole on it seemed like a big, unrefined O. Our friends told us the family that lived there made rice beer in large quantities. The elephant had broken into the stock room and drunk all of it. We had the knowledge that rice beer made people drunk. This was a common phenomenon here. Sadly, many families suffered ill health, poverty and anxiety because of it. Our young minds contemplated how the elephant must’ve walked drunk. We laughed beyond our bodies. Now after years, I feel the horror of what could’ve happened that didn’t. The elephant’s large trunk encroaching on the room—what if someone was sitting inside and the elephant got hold of the person? These kinds of incidents made us learn to adjust to their arrivals, though the elephants were not mentioned in the newspapers, only in pamphlets circulated by the company’s head among the employees, requesting them and their families to be wary of the elephant’s presence.

Eventually, the people began cutting down trees that bore fruits the elephants loved. How this process of cutting down trees began I don’t know. Maybe the way the elephants disheveled the tree branches inspired someone to cut down the entire tree. And then this became a common reaction to the elephants’ intrusions. With no food supply to settle its hunger, the male elephant lessened its visits. This continued for a span of four or five years, and then its arrivals ceased. We sometimes talked about it, and then we forgot in life’s busyness.

With time, my siblings and I had to relocate to nearby towns for our higher education. Once, returning, we happened to hire a car. It was noon in the hot month of May. Suddenly, we saw a large male elephant reaching into the back of a truck. We saw it was pulling out gunny bags filled with potatoes. This had created a traffic jam. Baba told the driver and us to close the car windows. Power windows were not very common in those days. The driver had little experience regarding this, as he was coming down from a city. We did, and began sweating, but there was no other way. Baba told us, it’s the same elephant that roamed in our colony. We saw the truck’s driver and the helper standing on the sidewalk cutting sad faces. We felt bad for them, and simultaneously for the elephant? How hungry he was. His hunger had forced him out of the receding forestline. We humans have a composite architecture. We desire almost everything, and at the same time we want nature to achieve compatibility with our actions. How is a balance possible when one is stretched beyond the margins?

My brother asked, “How do you know, Baba, it’s the same elephant?”

Baba answered, “Here, these days, a forest officer has been appointed.” He had told someone my Dad knew. This male elephant leads a solitary life. It roams, eats whatever it finds and then returns back to the forest. It is not harmful, but it’s better to take precautions, the forest officer had added to his advice for common people.

The next day, the newspaper headlines read, “New traffic police in town. What dedication!” The photograph was of the elephant eating potatoes. Accompanying it was another photograph of the gunny bags scattered around the vehicle. This kind of news became frequent, so we began to make our journeys by train.

In my sophomore year at senior college, one day the newspaper headline read, “The traffic police has been electrocuted”. There was no nearby utility pole, just a tall bamboo stalk dug into the earth. This narrated the whole story. The headline broke our hearts. Many days of our lives which the elephant had filled now felt emptied in a moment. The elephant’s tusks had been removed. Overnight, the poachers had taken them. Maybe it was they who had frightened it, to fulfill their malicious plans.

I don’t know where the tusks are now, what artifacts have been made out of them. If it was a cold-blooded murder, are the people who committed it behind bars? Or are they still roaming in search of another innocent animal to die in their trap just so that they can make a few more bucks. Bugs? Yes, actually bugs, not the hard-earned money people earn legitimately. Criminals such as them have minds filled with poisonous bugs.

Of course, we have stayed in close proximity to nature. We have seen wild boars, various kinds of snakes, velvet spiders, to name a few. Now too, a wide ground lies before the quarters of the flat we stay in, though there’s no wilderness. Grasses grow in their own way, then fawn, and then again in monsoons they turn green; a cycle to which the eyes, the body have got habituated. Some days, we go for walks along it. It’s nice and soothing, but not what it used to be in childhood, the forestline and the magic of living around it. The varieties of black-colored bird, carnivorous, feed themselves termites from the holes present at one end of our garden. The others were the large-sized cranes that stayed in the high-altitude trees: what did they eat? From where had they arrived in our township? No one had any idea. They just arrived and settled at my place. We didn’t have a camera, so after several Google searches, we couldn’t find out. Now, they are nowhere to be seen.

But more than anything we have seen or encountered, the elephants were the most memorable part of our lives since childhood. Seeing any elephant on the screen or in sanctuaries conjures up the ones we saw.

The Uses of Ideology: Kohei Saito’s Slow Down: The Degrowth Manifesto

Cover for SLOW DOWN: The Degrowth Manifesto by Kōhei Saitō, with an infinite shrinking book regression effect

How can—or can’t—ideological political movements serve us in the climate crisis?

It’s a question which increasingly nags while reading Kohei Saito’s “degrowth communism” bestseller, originally published in Japanese as Capital in the Anthropocene (2020). In this new English translation, University of Tokyo Marxist philosopher Saito promises to “excavate a completely new, previously unexplored aspect of Marx’s thought” (p. 13), uncovering Marx as an early advocate of—and revolutionary guide to—climate action.

Unfortunately, Slow Down ends up more bait-and-switch than road map. A disorganized structure and disturbingly jaundiced view of human nature produce something between polemic and projected cry of despair, while Marx’s supposed climate advocacy ultimately boils down to one offhand reference in an unsent letter.

Slow Down’s troubles begin with its own fundamental confusion about which readers, precisely, it’s aimed toward. Billed as a manifesto for the casual reader, but built as an academic critique, it speeds through brief, vague examples of how capitalism and the Green New Deal fail; explains degrowth; rebuts other Marxist scholars on fairly technical points of interpretation; and finally offers a few entry-level proposals to slow global economies and climate change.

Saito gives accessible, lucid explanations of certain concepts—atmospheric composition, tipping points, the commons, and degrowth scholarship—but rarely analyzes or synthesizes any of them, instead summarizing and re-summarizing old material until his argument visibly grows thin. For general readers, it’s a minefield—especially given Slow Down’s tendency to propagandize and speak in absolutes.

Slow Down fields a lot of broad claims in its pages—but never quite enough reasoning to back them.  Existing experiments like circular economies and negative emissions technologies are written off as “inadequate” by comparing them to historical colonialism—but without ever really unpacking why they’re similar. Goalposts are frequently moved: while it’s true that “recycling resources is, by itself, insufficient as a solution” (p. 76), so is any monolithic solution in a super-wicked problem, and dismissing mitigation tactics wholesale because they aren’t themselves a cure-all is alarmingly unserious.

Climate Action Tracker warming projections: Global temperature increase by 2100 December 2018 UpdateLikewise, studies are sloppily read and then used as foundational to the book’s arguments: “Even if every country abided by the (Paris) Agreement,” Saito says, “there are signs that global temperatures would rise by 3.3 C anyway,” (p. 17) citing Reuters coverage of a Climate Action Tracker report which quite clearly names “currently implemented policies,” not the effect of Paris Agreement commitments. The original CAT report says that if planned projects and policies came into force—if policies and commitments aligned—”warming by 2100 could be limited to 3C.” A 2018 call for implementation of commitments and their efficacy—do the promised work, thanks—is recast as whistleblowers decrying the entire framework of the Paris Agreement as ineffectual and pointless (p. 17).

This looseness with logic and mischaracterized citations proves crucial. Having declared the Paris Agreement—a document with faults and positives—ineffectual, Saito ties it to economist William Nordhaus’s projections of a 3.5 C rise in temperatures and declares Nordhaus’s projections “a strategy for economists to raise their profile.” He then insinuates that because Nordhaus’s earlier numbers and the Climate Action Tracker report happen to be “close,” then of course the Paris Agreement is also cynical economist political theatre, and of course, “world governments would be inclined to privilege economic growth and put off dealing with the problem at hand” (p. 15-17).  It’s conspiratorial thinking at best—misreading facts, misunderstanding causes and goals, and then patterning those distortions into conspiracies. At worst, it’s an active bad-faith attempt to destroy social trust in other solutions and corral readers into his own.

This is how Slow Down makes its case: a house built on proclamations and targeted attempts to discredit other ideas. The farther it goes, the shakier its logic starts to feel. Saito’s attempts to prevent this—classing these takedowns as “hard-to-hear” or “inconvenient truth” (p. 26, 76), and some pre-emptive social shaming—are a brittle defense.

That reflex to substitute thoughtful consideration with personal manipulativeness increasingly overtakes the book’s actual ideas. Saito takes pains to point out that he’s separating Marxist ideas from Soviet execution, and that modern Marxism comes in many flavours, but his analysis and rhetoric both seem stuck in authoritarian reflexes: foundationally assuming that realities are shaped by someone’s say-so alone; that all failures, institutional or personal, are deliberate, motivated, and luridly grotesque; and that the only way to change is by discarding bad-guy authorities and installing good-guy ones.

Saito appears convinced that anything a designated bad guy does can’t be just a wrong action but an active and deliberate betrayal. “We may well start to wonder if those calling for a Green New Deal truly believe in stopping climate change at all,” Saito exclaims, forgetting that sometimes people experiment with solutions rather than collude in full-scale social sabotage (p. 84). People buying fast fashion, he assumes, can’t be rushed, uninformed, underskilled, or any one of a constellation of factors feeding a global industry, each one a lever to reduce its harm if we’re organized and clever; they’re “consumers who want whole new wardrobes every season” to “satiate the[ir] unlimited desires” (p. 25). Every problem is the result of an enemy.

The result is a mindset which treats pointing out, discrediting, and personally caricaturing your enemies as how problem-solving works—as if large-scale social change is won by going birding for moral traitors. Slow Down can’t seem to grasp the idea of less extreme motivations: good faith in bad systems, objective or perceived limited options, or legitimate disagreements about process. It doesn’t seem to understand people.

Unfortunately, the worst of this blindness intersects with race. While it consistently acknowledges that the Global South faces harder climate impacts, Slow Down can’t seem to treat that vast, diverse region as more than the hapless class victim of the collective Global North, who must now be shamed into rescuing their victims. Solutions or climate initiatives from the Global South—of which plenty exist—are ignored beyond brief final-chapter namechecks, and Saito credits certain phenomena—the organizing strategies of agricultural communes, for example—to Marx instead of generations of campesino organizers.

While it’s true that the “periphery”—Saito’s term for the Global South—has taken disproportionate and generational environmental burdens from extractivism and colonialism, it’s still full of creative, capable people who use agency, strategize their lives, and make their own mistakes. Slow Down talks about listening, but occupies itself with abusing the enemies responsible for exploiting the Global South rather than citing or platforming those injured parties. It’s an ugly kind of objectification, and it leaves an aftertaste.

PM Press cover for Critique of the Gotha Program by Karl Marx, featuring a crossed soup ladle and meat tenderizerWhen we finally reach Saito’s proposed solutions, they’re mostly familiar to anyone who reads the news. He proposes curbing supply chain speculation, shortening workweeks, encouraging social ownership of public infrastructure, and prioritizing essential workers. After all that buildup, the pulpit rhetoric deflates into encouraging readers to sign petitions, participate in school strikes, and support organic farming. Saito’s “fresh” read of Marxism turns out to be the last casualty of Slow Down’s inability to see people in context. In a draft letter, Marx casually references a medieval German commune which designed economies against growth. Projecting his own rigid read of human motivations, Saito presumes that this society was deliberately Kohei Saito’s own personal, modern ideology, and that Marx’s mention of it is a coded sign of Marx having converted to degrowth.

And that’s it. Slow Down’s entire case for degrowth is that, according to one unsent letter blown up into a whole universe by Kohei Saito, it’s “Marx’s last wish.” I couldn’t stop imagining someone building a whole worldview off some of the letters I’ve never sent. When I picture that, my hands start to shake.

a black flower

Something extremely queasy dwells in Slow Down’s rigid blindness to the fluidity of human motivations—Marx’s included. It’s the heart of the trouble in this book: its core beliefs about authority, solution, change, and choice. It can’t seem to shake an authoritarian conviction that we’re all helpless before the whims of monsters, or that positive change means holding a nightstick to someone else’s throat. It’s a relationship with authority and social trust that bluntly scares the shit out of me.

What’s sad is that I found so many of Saito’s more pragmatic statements sensible and obvious: we must use less; we must share social resources both locally and globally; mutual aid and restoring the commons are good, and disaster capitalism is abhorrent; a detransactionalized, more open-source society would be a better one. We agree on a great deal of what might work. But when I asked myself if I’d want to build that society with anyone who came to those conclusions through this book, I hesitated.

We are reading, speaking, and working on climate questions in a season when many climate seminars and activities begin with a grounding exercise. A baseline level of perpetual trauma is almost assumed. The crackling cognitive load of grief, fear, and precarity in these spaces is already intense.

As someone organizing locally on climate, I can’t help but read any call to arms as prefiguring the relations it’ll produce in the people who answer. How would Slow Down’s converts act once they enter climate work? Propaganda can lead people to your point of view, yes, but it affects what state they arrive in, what they track in with them, and how often you’ll have to sweep the proverbial floor.

It’s difficult to imagine this text’s projection, paranoia, incuriosity, casual objectification, and brittle analyses of both the world and the infinite human heart not rubbing off on how those people would work. When you berate people into virtue, mostly you’ve convinced a bunch of people that berating others is an actual day of work. As abolitionist scholar Danielle Sered writes, “no one enters violence for the first time by committing it”, and recruiting people with violence is a great way to reproduce it.

But almost worse is the impression that Slow Down fears you’ll do the right things for the wrong reasons. Tangled in the jealous one-upmanship of small ideological games for even tinier prizes, it seems terrified that even if you care about climate, you might care wrong: your worship feeding the wrong god. With wildfire smoke on the move and rivers flooding weekly this past summer here in Toronto, this is pettiness I can’t entertain.

Ultimately, Slow Down’s approach to force-grown epiphanies has led me to a more uncomfortable question: in what circumstances is this ideology-first approach actually useful in the climate project? This book has sold over 500,000 copies in Japan; it obviously appeals to somebody. But if Slow Down aims to mobilize an army, which part of this problem is shaped like a war? Is there a generative route to climate action here?

I didn’t walk away with an answer; I should very much like one. As noted at the beginning, I cannot find the reader: the person for whom this is the right book at the right time. Or more specifically, I can’t find the reader who, if they’re lost, would be made better by this approach. There are things of value in Saito’s desire to re-regulate our relationships with ecology. But how Saito gets there, how he insistently degrades and coerces his readers in the process, and what it means to come into a movement that is supposed to uplift and preserve life through a door made of panic, degradation, mistrust, and despair—all these make Slow Down a title I can’t in good faith recommend.

Slow Down and I are not having a disagreement about ideologies or institutions. We’re having a disagreement about people: their fundamental nature and worth, whether pain creates or destroys them, if and how authority owns them, and how we should come into relationship together to build a just world. It’s a disagreement I fear is irretrievable. Do I want more colleagues in creating a sustainable and just future? Hell yes. But I left Slow Down thinking I should prefer to meet them willing and whole.

From the Editors: Persistence

Reckoning 9 comes to you from a year of reading and discussion—from intervals of not quite thinking we knew what this unthemed issue should look like to flurries of activity, enthusiasm and advocacy. Then, in a slow pull-back at the end of the submission window, everyone on the editorial team started to say okay, yes. Together with the writers, thanks to them and to each other, we are starting to have done the work to make this issue happen.

It’s a remarkable one. I’m tempted to say the individual pieces of writing started talking to each other early and knew what they were collectively about well before the editors did. As C.G. has said, there’s a tremendous amount of grief here. There’s also a repeated witness of tenacity and urgent acts of preservation and restoration. We remember or learn of “six dolphins/safe in a hotel swimming pool” via Allison Whittenberg’s brief, luminous “Katrina.” If the young daughter in Ellen K. Fee’s “baby’s breath” is born into a world that’s losing its flowers, she may yet make something new with the stalks left behind, “begin anything with a bundle of sticks.” Leah Bobet’s “Klamath River Hymn” reminds us, in the leaping of wild salmon, that while our desire for environmental restoration is powerful and can work in tandem with natural forces, repair itself is not a quick process. That we must have patience for the process of mending, wherever it begins.

We’re glad you’re joining with us to read, to mourn, to consider, to plan, to create. May these stories, poems, and essays accompany you well in the coming year.

From the Editors: Resistance

How does Twitter’s collapse relate to the climate crisis?

I’m far from alone in retreating from global social media to more private spaces—shared interests, affinities, locality. The most pertinent one here is my forest stewardship community. Even the solitary act of cutting up an invasive tree—mitigating centuries of damage caused by settlers to a formerly well-managed landscape—becomes communal quickly. Nature can never be fully reduced to a guidebook, and there will always be a behavior to surprise us, as with the elephants of Purbasha Roy’s childhood.

Sharing space, whether virtual or physical, inevitably results in shared experiences. Many of these are found in Reckoning 9: both the comfort of finding shared purpose, as in Siobhon Rumurang’s “Cloud, Cloud”, an act of anticolonial resistance, and the darker side—shared beliefs that contradict one’s lived experience, as for the narrator of E.L. Mellor’s debut story, “Blue Speck”. No space can fully escape a dialogue with its own history or marginalized present.

Ultimately we are reminded that community is essential, inevitable, and coalesced around some shared quality. We can shout into the void, but it’s the people next to us who will hear, understand, and, hopefully, spread the word.

From the Editors: Grief

When we decided to leave Reckoning 9 without a theme, I wasn’t certain what to expect. Speculative fiction brings to environmental justice writing endless possibilities. Within speculative fiction, we explore difficult topics like climate change, pollution, and human displacement from the comfortable frames of comic sci-fi, cozy fantasy, and solarpunk. “No theme” could have well meant chaos, but even as the submissions for this issue spanned genres and galaxies and uncertain futures, I found an oft repeating thread: we are all grieving.

Some of us are grieving for the lives of loved ones lost. Some of us are grieving the loss of our homes and livelihoods to climate change. Some of us are grieving the countless ecosystems lost or nearly lost to environmental destruction and degradation. Many of us are grieving the loss of community, of connection, with each other and with our planet. For some, this grief is new. For far too many, it is generational, an historic truth with consequences immediate and future-reaching, as the essays of Marianna Ariel ColesCurtis and Jacqueline St. Pierre so rightly remind us.

It is an immense privilege to grieve with you, to not only hold space for such profound losses, but to lift the voices and hearts of those whose grief has gone too long ignored or silenced. In the way of comfort, there is little that I can say that others, many collected here, have not said better. I can only offer, through their works, the power of resistance, the strength of community, and the persistence of nature, of which we humans are still very much a part.

I hope you’ll take what you need and share what you can.

 

21 December 2024

From the traditional border of Tuscarora and Siouan territory.

Review: Metamorphosis: Climate Fiction for a Better Future. Milkweed Editions, 2024

Cover artwork for Metamorphosis: Climate Fiction for a Better Future, featuring a Black woman's face in profile with pink fish floating past herWhat it’s like. When the death of your home is someone else’s lesson learned (p. 118).

 

These are the thoughts of Dario, who lives in a vertical city after sea-level rise claimed his childhood home and forced him to resettle. He watches, captivated, as the artist Yeong-cheol Min sculpts clay into a representation of Dario’s former homeland, a series of barrier islands now raised only in art above the all-consuming waters, made visible through the artist’s careful and deliberate touch.

This scene is from “Accensa Domo Proximi” by Cameron Ishee, one of twelve short stories in Metamorphosis, an anthology composed of winning submissions to Grist’s Imagine 2200 short story contest. Unlike climate change fiction that depicts dystopian and apocalyptic worlds, these stories craft different visions for humanity’s future, ones that offer “hope and faith in our ability as an imperfect but resilient species to unpack past traumas, discard old beliefs and traditions that no longer serve us, and embrace community wherever we are fortunate enough to find, build, and nurture it” (p. xiii).

In Metamorphosis, you will find solar bikes, basic income for everyone, plans for rewilding, hydrogardens, solar lights, regenerative farming, community gardens, gift economies, and guaranteed housing, health care, education and food. There is advanced technology, but it works in collaboration with the humans who created it and facilitates a more sustainable future. As utopian as this sounds, the challenge of achieving these developments is not underestimated or ignored.

In “Cabbage Koora: A Prognostic Autobiography” by Sanjana Sekhar, which details the lives of a diasporic Indian family seeking to preserve their traditions and connections with one another, the transition to a more sustainable future is not straightforward: “The question of who pays for this transition, what carbon taxes get charged or credited and to whom, and who leads the proposed solutions that take the place of the old order… Well, it’s been a thorny time. But it’s also a time of inspired experimentation” (p. 126). In other words, the solutions—and their implementation—aren’t perfect. Thinking of ambitious plans proposed in our contemporary society—the Green New Deal in the United States or the European Green Deal in Europe—these questions sound familiar. They are the ones asked to the politicians and governments behind the proposals: Who will pay? Who will benefit and who will lose out? What values or beliefs are being promoted through these policies? Sekhar explores the complexity of answering these questions in “Cabbage Koora,” but she does so optimistically. In her story, even though there are challenges—like funding, which is a “constant issue for these initiatives” (p. 126)—humans are still on track to get it right, because they are committed to a vision of what can be.

The stories in Metamorphosis also address the devastating realities caused by climate change, including the fact that many of its effects cannot be quickly reversed. Resilience is an essential component of a climate-changed future, and loss, grief, and anger remain present and deeply rooted emotions. In “To Labor for the Hive” by Jamie Liu, a beekeeper forms an unlikely friendship over text with a support person collecting research on how bees can serve as an early warning system for floods. In one of their conversations, the beekeeper, Huaxin, expresses frustration over humanity’s past failures.

 

HUAXIN: We made the mess that’s making you have to do this whole early warning thing, right?

HUAXIN: selfishly polluting and not caring about nature

SUPPORT: We also realized our mistakes and put ourselves on the path to healing the planet. Isn’t that a good redemption arc? (p. 24)

 

Like countless generations before, humans continue to write the story of humanity. Our actions and choices shape the plot and craft the narrative arc. In this conversation between Huaxin and the support person, the weight of those decisions—and inevitable faults and wrongdoings—are laid bare. Yet the support person’s response offers compassion: true, humans have lived and exploited selfishly in the past, but that doesn’t mean they have to choose that same path, that same story, for the future.

These ideas of regret, of past missteps, and of the desire for redemption are explored even more poignantly in Louis Evans’s “A Seder in Siberia,” which examines a Jewish family living in Siberia as a consequence of the climate crisis. During the family’s Passover celebration, a long-lost son returns after attempting to secure his family’s repatriation in Texas. He brings with him knowledge of the real reason behind their family’s exile, something the father had hidden from them—that the father was not a victim of the climate crisis, but a perpetrator of atrocities in its wake.

Evans writes: “What happened in Texas was complicated. Drought in the Rio Grande. Crop failures across the Great Plains, from Nuevo-Leon to Iowa. Mass migration along several distinct axes. Dismemberment of the petrochemical industry. Rocket riots over Project Sunshade. Paramilitary violence and military violence…. System failures are as complicated as systems themselves” (p. 152).

In Evans’s story, there is not an easy redemption. The consequences of actions are not so easily reversed. Yet by acknowledging this, Evans opens up the door for a different, perhaps more grounded, understanding of the crisis we face—that we are responsible, that we do carry the consequences of our actions, and that redemption may not come right away. Still, we can be moved by the desire to act differently, and it again becomes a choice: whether one chooses to do as those who came before them or chooses to act differently than even those people they love. In these stories, Metamorphosis reveals how regret, loss, and grief—while experienced negatively—have the power to transform us.

 

I finished reading Metamorphosis the week that Hurricane Helene came ashore through the Gulf of Mexico, bringing unprecedented rainfall and destruction in six states across six hundred miles—including the state where I currently reside, North Carolina. Fueled by record-breaking warm waters in the Gulf of Mexico, Helene destroyed houses, businesses, roads, towns, and cities. Like Dario in “Accensa Domo Proximi,” countless people looked on as the waters rose and their homes washed away.

The attention to the destruction caused by Hurricane Helene is pointed and widespread—Google “Hurricane Helene, western North Carolina” and countless articles and Youtube videos will populate your screen. Yet whether this event will join the ranks of other natural disasters made worse by climate change but failing to catalyze climate action will be determined in the coming weeks, months and years. Alongside news of the disaster, though, stories are breaking through of the people who are there and who are helping one another to survive and to rebuild. There’s a donut shop I love in downtown Asheville that makes the best vegan donuts, and while they remain closed in Helene’s aftermath, they have rallied together with other small businesses to provide food, drinking water, hot meals, and even dog food to local residents. There is resilience here. There is compassion, community, and innovation. Amidst devastation, somehow the best of who we are—who we can be—is on display.

In “Seven Sisters” by Susan Kaye Quinn, a collective of women living and working together on a tea farm are struggling to make ends meet when they suddenly find themselves faced with the decision of whether or not to add another member to their commune. Questions of scarcity, of value, and of how family is defined scatter across the pages. Ultimately, though, it is the power of community that prevails, rooted in hope as a foundation of resilience. As one of the characters reflects, “Hope was no kind of business strategy, but it kept you moving through hard times, waiting on better ones. And family—your chosen ones, your vow, and your love for one another—was what carried you through” (p. 54). This sense of hope, this sense of community, is what I’ve seen alongside the devastation as people come together to rebuild from Hurricane Helene.

 

For me, it is in showing readers what is possible if we make the decision to change that is the true magic of Metamorphosis. Yeong-cheol, the artist in “Accensa Domo Proximi,” speaks to the crowd that has gathered around him.

Accensa domo proximi, tua quoque periclitatur…. It’s unattributed, but a powerful line. ‘When the house of your neighbor burns, your own home is likewise in danger.’ A millenia-old phrase, passed down through generations. And yet not something our collective human society managed to internalize, at least in certain arenas, until recently. (p. 119)

With the words “until recently,” the narrative of disaster shifts from one of destruction and despair, to one of change and growth; to one that holds the global community of human beings accountable for their actions and what happens to their neighbors; to one that shows we still have the capacity to care if we choose to. At its core, this is what Metamorphosis does—it changes the story from one of hopelessness and apathy to one of action and opportunity.

While Metamorphosis doesn’t shy away from the complicated nature of climate change and our culpability, the stories remain resolutely forward-looking and forward-thinking. Readers of this anthology will travel to both near and far futures, to locations ranging from California and Mexico, to Siberia and the Caribbean. Once there, they will find relationships, communities, and innovation, all rooted in principles of sustainability, inclusivity and justice. Each story is crafted with beautiful and compelling prose, and while painting vastly different futures, they remain in conversation with one another—building on ideas and providing a kaleidoscopic array of possibilities.

Metamorphosis travels through time to futures that we desire and can aspire toward, chipping away at deeply rooted cynicism. And as the climate crisis continues to unfold with devastating consequences around the globe, the urgent need for stories like the ones found in this anthology is increasingly apparent. As a species, as a collective community, there is a longing for the kind of hopeful climate fiction these stories offer, for narratives that give us different ideas, different dreams, different inspirations. We want stories that show us what is possible rather than what currently is. And anticipating readers’ protests that change is messy and complicated, the authors ask us—artfully and subtly—to tap into the reservoirs of strength we inherently hold: relying on one another, on our communities, and on our capacity for love and innovation to collectively pursue a sustainable future. As Rae Mariz writes in “The Imperfect Blue Marble,” a story about a child who has an affinity for marbles made by a local glassmaker, “See, storytellers are time travelers. Always have been” (p. 169).

 

The storytellers in Metamorphosis are the time travelers of our era, and the work done by Grist and their Imagine 2200 team to bring this project to fruition has uplifted the genre of climate fiction by allowing readers the chance to imagine a future that does not end in the inevitable destruction of humankind and the planet. As the oceans rise and the world warms, as species go extinct and people are forced out of their homes, each moment carries the weight of our decisions: whether we choose to act, or choose to look away.

I will return to Metamorphosis in the coming months and years as a reminder of what is possible and of what my role can be in transforming that possibility into reality, what role all of us can play in creating a different future. In the words of a wise character in “Cabbage Koora: A Prognostic Autobiography”: “Our survival is predicated on our ability to work together” (p. 134).